<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Prometheus</title>
	<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com</link>
	<description>Johns Hopkins Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Case For Vague Objects</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>By Jaime Harrell</strong><br />In this paper, I examine David Lewisʼ treatment of vagueness as a problem of “semantic indecision” and conclude that this position on vagueness is inconsistent with the metaphysics of his theory of modal realism. To reach this, I employ a thought experiment in which an exact counterpart of Lewis is subjected to a series of possible worlds treatments designed to satisfy Lewisʼ criteria for counterparthood and test the limits of semantic treatments of higher-order vagueness. I find that Lewisʼ suggestions for dealing with vagueness fails to pick out counterparts at several points in this series, even when given a satisfactorily precisified set of criteria for the qua relation.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/12/de-re-modality-and-lewis%ca%bc-modal-realism-the-case-for-vague-objects/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Aesthetic Futurity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Edmund Zagorin
ABSTRACT: The evolution of artistic expression is often understood to be co-productive with a certain apprehended teleology of culture: “progress”, a notion itself instantiated by false axiomatic assumptions concerning biological evolution. These meditations will seek to critically interrogate teleological assumptions by de-structively mapping the future evolution of artistic expression through a radically empirical attention to the flows of cultural raw materials, media-structures, mediums, memes and messages. By attending to processes associated with growing media digitzation, inter-connectedness and fragmenting attention span, these meditations will seek to illuminate a cultural ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/12/aesthetic-futurity/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heidegger’s Secular Fall</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joseph N. Rees
ABSTRACT: Many  commentators are extremely critical of Heidegger’s ambiguous conflation  of Being-with and das Man in Being and Time. The text  of Division One, Chapter Four shifts between an ethically neutral and  ontologically necessary account of Dasein’s Being-with-others and  an ethically saturated and contingent account of the same phenomenon,  leaving the reader confused as to whether Heidegger is accepting sociality  as a necessary and inexorable condition of human existence or a pervasive  yet ultimately contingent impediment to authentic existence. ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/12/heidegger%e2%80%99s-secular-fall/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Philosophical Opposition of Liberty and Utility</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Raafay Syed
John Stuart Mill, one of the most prominent British philosophers of the 19th century, has had a tremendous influence on political philosophy, ethical theory, and much of the liberal thought which has dominated contemporary Western culture. His libertarian viewpoints are espoused in his essay On Liberty, which is an unwavering defense of individual liberty and freedom from limitations imposed by society. A few years later, Mill published his essay Utilitarianism, in which he argues that utility is the fundamental principle of morality. The principle of utility, or the ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/12/philosophical-opposition-of-liberty-and-utility/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Knowing Nŏl&#8217;ĭj</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Alex Ehrlich &#38; AJ Durwin
Abstract: Ever since Plato described knowledge in the Theaetetus and the Meno, three criteria, namely justification, truth, and belief (JTB), have composed the traditional philosophical definition of knowledge. In his 1963 paper “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Edmund Gettier attempts to disestablish the traditional definition of knowledge. He utilizes a thought experiment in which a person appears to meet the knowledge criteria yet still does not seem to have knowledge. In this paper we clarify and specify the definition of knowledge, breaking the justification criterion ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/12/knowing-nolij/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>By Cuong Q. Nguyen</strong><br />Last semester I posted a riddle regarded by a number of contemporary philosophers as the "hardest" logic puzzle in the world.  Raymond Smullyan, a prominent logician and philosopher, has a number of logic puzzles available online for people to solve, and this particular puzzle received a lot of attention from our readers.  After some considerable delay, here is both my solution and various other solutions to the puzzle.  Enjoy!</br>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/09/solution-to-the-hardest-logic-puzzle-ever/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Saving Means: Technology, Art, and Techne</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Nestor	Bailly
Abbreviations for Heidegger and other works cited:
QT – The Question Concerning Technology
Ister – Hölderlin’s Hymn “The Ister”
WAPF – What Are Poets For?
SR – Science and Reflection
OWA – The Origin of the Work of Art
PLT – Hofstadter’s Introduction to Poetry, Language, Thought
Zimmerman – Michael Zimmerman’s Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity
Ferry and Renaut – Heidegger and Modernity trans. Franklin Philip
&#8212;
Here the question of the saving power potential of art against technology’s worlding as the standing-reserve will be addressed. Section I will provide a grounding analysis of Heidegger’s notions of technology and art ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/09/the-saving-means-technology-art-and-techne/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Free Will &amp; Divine Action</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Michael Schwartz
Abstract: While there is significant variation in the theist’s description of God, there are nonetheless a set of attributes upon which there is general (but certainly not universal) agreement.  God is omnipotent, omniscient, and is capable of interacting in the lives of humans.  My purpose in this paper is to provide an account of God’s relation to time given an assumption of these three divine attributes.  I will show that the task is unsuccessful for an eternal God (one that exists outside of time), and ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/09/free-will-divine-action/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Role of Will in a Neuroscientific World</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Markus Prinz
I. Introduction
The debate on the role of neuroscience in the context of the law has crucial repercussions for the notion of legal responsibility. Legal responsibility and moral responsibility are not necessarily analogous; however, there is a strong correlation. Moral responsibility often informs our sense of legal responsibility, but the latter is best understood as a subset of the former. Legal responsibility is less demanding than moral responsibility mainly due to the context of its function: the courtroom. In the courtroom, evidence is the focus of judgments, whereas moral ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/09/role-of-will-in-a-neuroscientific-world/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Whether States of Affairs Make Propositions True</title>
		<description><![CDATA[By Benjamin Perlin
Abstract: This paper discusses the central argument of A World of States of Affairs by David Armstrong, which is intended to posit states of affairs as fundamental ontological entities. This ‘truth-maker’ argument is intended to conclude that states of affairs are what make propositions true; I explore this position and the response by David Lewis, which is a tentative rejection of Armstrong’s position in favour of a supremely permissive combinatorialism.
&#8212;
The sentence “the sun is bright” expresses a true proposition. What, if anything, makes it true? The tentative answer ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.prometheus-journal.com/2009/09/on-whether-states-of-affairs-make-propositions-true/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
